Washington Fair Trade Coalition is the legacy of the 1999 WTO shut-down in Seattle
- Labor, environmental, faith, farmer, student and social justice groups jointly mobilized into a powerful movement for trade justice
- Civil society established the right to be involved in setting trade policy, previously the monopoly of investors and business interests
What We Believe
We believe trade between countries plays a critical role in helping to create a just, prosperous, and sustainable world economy. We also believe trade policy should treat all sectors of society fairly, and that benefits of trade should be shared widely across communities and countries.
Staff & Board
WFTC Fair and Just Trade vision Paper
Washington Fair Trade Coalition’s vision paper expresses what good trade policy would look like. The trade justice community is often characterized as saying no to trade agreements. The Coalition wanted to produce a set of positive principles for trade advocacy on behalf of people and the planet.
In drafting a people’s vision for fair and just trade policy, the Washington Fair Trade Coalition felt it was important to hear directly from the people in Washington State most affected by our trade policies. We convened a broad base of our membership to discuss our shared values and each group’s specific concerns. The working groups included workers and local union leadership; environmentalists; human rights activists; public health advocates; equity and racial justice organizations; farmworker, sustainable farm, and food access groups; immigrant rights groups, and international solidarity organizations. We focused on local groups in order to maximize in-person conversation, and also consulted with international allies throughout the process.
The recommendations that follow came out of this process.
Transparent and Democratic Globalization
“Trade negotiations should create the domestic space needed to protect social programs and regulations, renew domestic social contracts, and pursue locally tailored growth policies. Such a reorientation would benefit rich and poor nations alike.” –Dani Rodrik, Economist, Harvard University
Trade agreements set the rules for the global economy. In an increasingly globalizing world, good trade policy is part of a delicate balancing act, supporting local decision-making and innovation while fostering global cooperation.
It matters who writes those rules. For trade policies to work for all of us, we must have a negotiation process that includes all of our voices, balances our different interests, and allows us to adapt to changing conditions. Alone, no one group or sector has the entire solution to challenges that face us on a local and global level, from growing income inequality to climate change. Trade policy could be a tool in supporting those solutions – but only if it reflects the interests of the people it will affect.
Trade policies now: Corporations write the rules
When giant multinational corporations like Chevron, Walmart, Monsanto, Cargill, and Citibank set negotiating objectives with little public oversight, we get rules that benefit global corporations.
This is exactly what has been happening since NAFTA. Trade policies have been negotiated with increasing levels of secrecy, making it impossible for stakeholders and trade justice advocates in each country to review draft proposals or influence what is being proposed in their names. While each country has its own process for developing negotiating objectives, most countries cater to powerful multinational corporations, desperate to attract business and jobs. Corporate negotiators typically pit country against country in a race to the bottom for standards.
The corporate-friendly rules set in current trade negotiations are designed to be permanent. These deals —made behind closed doors— have eliminated vital regulations and programs, locking governments into policies such as privatization or maintaining energy exports, while limiting the ways communities and governments can respond to future problems.
Good trade policy prioritizes the public interest:
The public has a say in setting priorities
- Before negotiations begin, all countries involved conduct a rigorous and democratic consultation process to set negotiating priorities. This should occur at the local, regional, and national levels and involve a wide range of stakeholders beyond business interests, such as labor, environmental, and human rights organizations, and communities most affected by trade
Negotiations are open, transparent, and inclusive
- After each negotiating round, the current text is made public for review and comment. If broad-based concerns arise, negotiators must address these in subsequent rounds
- A significantproportion of trade negotiation advisors should represent civil society
Countries must meet their commitmentsbeforethe trade deal goes into effect
- Countries must meet their base labor and environmental commitments beforegetting preferred status to markets
- All participating countries agree to help each other make progress on these commitments. Funding for oversight and enforcement is built into the agreement
Hold governments and corporations accountable to local communities
- Establish a strong “general exception” that allows governments to act in the public interest without being challenged under provisions in trade agreements
- Remove deceptively named standards such as “most favored nation status” and “least trade restrictive possible” that prioritize multinational corporations over public interests
- Remove special protections for corporations (such as Investor-State Dispute Settlement) and require they use national courts
- Create an independent arbitration and enforcement body to carry out ongoing investigation and settle complaints regarding labor and environmental protections, and ensure that potentially affected communities, public interest groups, and governments can bring complaints directly
- Do not use trade policy to promote privatization of public services such as health, education, transportation, energy, and telecommunications, nor include provisions that prevent the return of those services to public control
Trade policies should be subject to periodic review
- Require that countries come back together periodically to review the impacts of the trade policy on public interest, including a rigorous and democratic evaluation in each country
- If countries do not agree to reauthorize or renegotiate the policy, it will phase out automatically
Food Sovereignty/Safe, Healthy, Accessible Food
“Food is our most intimate connection to each other, to our cultures, and to the earth, and to transform our food system is to take one giant step towards healing our bodies, our economy, and our environment.” –HEAL (Health, Environment, Agriculture, Labor) Alliance platform for real food
Food is vital to all beings on the planet. Communities have the right to define their own food systems –how people produce and access food, where foods come from, what they know about them, which foods are important, and what makes food safe— without intervention or pressure from trade policies. However, once food crosses borders, local protection may be required.
Trade policy needs to support efforts to build a fairer food system, in which all people can access the foods they need and are culturally important. Food must be produced and distributed fairly. The people who grow, harvest, transport, process, and sell food deserve safe work conditions and economic stability. Sustainable and bio-diverse food production has to be prioritized, to limit agriculture’s contribution to climate change and to ensure our ability to produce food long-term.
Trade Policies Now: Food Monopolies, Pollution, Hunger, and Unsafe Food
Trade agreements such as the WTO and NAFTA have favored multinational agribusiness corporations at the expense of small farmers, agricultural workers, consumers, and the environment.
Trade agreements have made it easier for corporate farms to shift production to low-cost and low–regulation sites. Agribusinessconstructed supply chains across countries from seed to supermarket, concentrating market and political power and hogging the benefits of trade.
Through NAFTA, subsidized U.S. agribusiness soldcorn to Mexico at below-market prices, driving two million small farmers off land, into poverty, or across the border. In the U.S., over 200,000 small farmers have left agriculture since NAFTA, while corporate concentration has rapidly increased.
Transnational corporations rely on industrial agricultural methods that contribute mightily to toxic chemical contamination, land and water degradation, and climate change. Existing trade agreements do not allow the policy space communities need to address these serious problems, or to support local farmers, workers, or families. They do the opposite by allowing powerful multinationals to challenge any policies that harm their profitability.
Trade agreements have also been used to undermine food safety, by “harmonizing” (to the lowest standard) inspection regimes. Trade rulings have challenged our right to know what is in our food or where it comes from, striking down country-of-origin and dolphin-safe tuna labeling.
Good trade policy supports food sovereignty:
Consumers can trust they have safe and healthy food
- Ensure food quality criteria and standards can be defined and enforced at a local level, including protecting culturally important foods
- Protect the rights of local governments to regulate or tax certain foods, such as highly processed foods or sugary drinks, with the aim of protecting public health
People decide what information about their food is publicly available
- Protect the right of local governments to require labeling of health impacts, contents, use of biotechnology, location of production, environmental and labor conditions, etc.
- Promote mechanisms of supply-chain accountability and traceability, especially for seafood and meat products
Workers, producers, and agricultural families have dignity and economic security
- Require that all workers in the food chain be paid a living wage
- Include enforceable labor standards and effective enforcement mechanisms
- Require that national labor laws apply to all workers regardless of whether they are migrants, temporary workers, or non-citizens
- Protect the right of workers to organize and collectively bargain
- Require that guest worker programs, such as the U.S. H-2A visa for agricultural workers, meet the highest local standard for wages and working conditions, and that workers have protected rights to organize and to sue employers
Responsible producers are protected in the global economy
- Allow measures to discourage poor environmental or work conditions and to reflect thetruecost of production, including settingtariffs on products made with lower standards
- Level the playing field for small and medium-scale producers by creating measures that limit monopolies and prevent dumping of products at below-market prices
Communities can build and protect local food systems
- Protect local and national buy local preferences
- Uphold the rights for property and resources to be held communally, as well as local efforts for redistribution and land reform
- Allow local governments to restrict the sale of agricultural lands to outside corporations
- Remove provisions from trade deals that limit farmers’ ability to share and save seeds
- Allow stability measures such as farm supports, food reserves, and price fixing for staples
Sustainable Future and Stable Climate
“Restoring our planet’s health will require a lasting redistribution of power and resources. Recognizing our common heritage of food, water, and energy should be at the heart of a new framework for global resources management.” – Gopal Dayaneni & Mateo Nube, Movement Generation
Trade policy must support the need for a secure and safe world, now and into the future. This means encouraging ecological balance and diversity, creating protections from natural disasters, and making sure that environmental protection cannot be held hostage to investor interests.
It also means promoting business models that put the long-term gains for the many over the short term benefits for the few. Natural resources need to be stewarded for the common good, not privatized and unsustainably exploited. Communities that have been exploited in the past must be supported in development and mitigation efforts. Trade policies must recognize the tremendous threat climate change poses and support international and local efforts to plan and implement a just transition to a sustainable, low-carbon, resource-balanced society that promotes people’s rights, honors their work, and protects the well-being and integrity of all life on the planet.
Trade Policies Now: Holding Environmental Protections Hostage to Global Profits
Current trade policy puts maximized trade and short-term profits above the welfare of people and the planet.
Trade agreements have many detailed chapters protecting corporate rights to invest and not be “burdened” by regulation, even creating an arbitration body where corporations can challenge regulations and demand unlimited compensation. When (after intense public pressure) environmental protections are included in trade policies, enforcement is weak or nonexistent.
These corporate rights enshrined in trade agreements have encouraged powerful companies to cut costs, degrade the environment, pollute, and strip resources unsustainably. Society is forced to foot the bill for increased health problems and natural disasters. When local governments try to enforce or raise environmental standards, corporate polluters outsource factories to where they can negotiate lower standards. They then import these cheap goods made on the backs of workers and the environment, at an unfair advantage over companies that follow the rules.
In fact, most of the policies that will be required to address the climate crisis –for example, creating green jobs and buy local initiatives, restricting fossil fuel infrastructure and exports, and ramping up a set of global environmental standards—have been repeatedly struck down by trade agreements as illegal trade barriers.
Good trade policy promotes a sustainable future:
Support the right to a healthy, sustainable, and safe environment
- Protect the rights of communities and governments to communally hold, regulate, and protect basic needs like water, air, food, shelter, and land
- Create an independent arbitration body where communities can bring complaints against companies that violate the right to a healthy, sustainable, and safe environment
- Eliminate trade rules that lock in fossil fuel exports, such as NAFTA’s Proportionality Clause and rules that lock in weak fossil fuel emission standards
- Allow government agencies to review whether fossil fuel exports are in the public interest
Make polluters and extractive industries pay their fair share
- Set higher tariffs for products produced with poor environmental and work conditions
- Eliminate subsidies and special protections for polluters and extractive industries and encourage investments in impacted communities
- Require corporations extracting or accessing communal water resources be subject to international clean water standards and prohibited from overuse
- Require countries adhere to international “burden sharing” agreements where high emission countries help fund climate mitigation in lower emission countries
Give preference to ethical, sustainable production
- Encourage supply chain transparency and tracking of environmental impacts of products
- Allow governments to give preference to products produced with higher environmental and social standards, including carbon footprint
- Set limitationson patents in order to keep green technology affordable
Support and prioritize local economies
- Protect the ability of governments to require companies to invest, source, and hire locally
- Allow countries to use tariffs or other measures to encourage new green industries
- Allow countries to set policies encouraging local processing and discouraging export of raw materials and fossil fuels
- Require multinational corporations to meaningfully include impacted communities in development plans
Create a fair playing field by setting basic environmental standards
- Require each participating country to ratify important international environmental and labor agreements, including treaties protecting Indigenous rights and the Paris climate agreement, and to implement and maintain policies ensuring compliance
“Recent trade agreements increase the need for public policy intervention to counteract rising health inequalities but at the same time reduce the capacity of national governments to invest in intervention.”, Tim Huijts and Courtney McNamara
Trade agreements must support healthy communities and environments, improving the possibilities for people to reach their full potential and have a high quality of life–affordable quality food, clean water, health care, housing, education, work, and many other elements. Fostering healthy communities will require important changes in trade agreements. Access to life saving medicines and programs addressing global public health needs must be prioritized. Since poverty and inequality are major drivers of poor health, provisions of trade agreements also need to support social policy tools that benefit society as a whole.
Trade Policies Now: Profits Above Health
Instead of supporting the global and local strategies necessary to promote health and well-being, the WTO and subsequent trade policies have repeatedly been used to challenge public health policies.
Since the 1994 WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), pharmaceutical companies have pushed for stronger monopoly protections in trade deals. Access to generic drugs is critical to make life-saving medicines affordable; in the case of AIDS, the production of generic medicines in India brought prices for a year’s treatment down from $10,000 (in 2000) to around $100 in just one decade, making possible the treatment of massive numbers of people living with HIV. Despite this, big pharmaceutical companies have lobbied for provisions that would allow them to extend patents by making minor modifications to old medicine or limiting access to data from clinical trials.
Corporate interests have extended far beyond medicines. Multinational corporations producing tobacco, alcohol, highly processed food, breast milk substitutes and other potentially health-damaging products have used trade agreements to challenge public health programs that are designed to control their use. Using corporate arbitration panels, these companies have demanded—and in some cases won—compensation for lost profits, effectively discouraging new regulations.
Public services such as healthcare have been subjected to massive privatization and deregulation measures, using the unsubstantiated claim that opening up the market to competition is good for patients. Instead of improving access and lowering prices for healthcare, these private health corporations have often focused on cutting costs and serving the patients who were most profitable, at the expense of the poor and most vulnerable of a country’s population.
Good Trade Policy Builds Strong Healthy Communities:
Ensure the ability of countries to pass laws protecting and promoting the public health
- Protect the right of local governments to label, regulate, and/or completely ban activities and products that negatively impact public health, such as pesticides, herbicides, food additives or animal hormones
– Protect the ability of governments to levy taxes on global businesses operating in their area for public health investments
Regulate products and services that damage public health
- Require that all companies meet minimum international and national standards for marketing and sales of potentially harmful products
- Allow nations and local communities to set higher or precautionary standards of their choosing on products and services that can damage public health, including big tobacco, alcohol, highly processed foods, infant formula
- Create an independent arbitration and enforcement body where communities can bring complaints against companies that violate public health standards
Keep life-saving medicines affordable and accessible
– Promote generic competition to lower medicine prices; for example, by raising standards for patent extensions and ensuring clinical data can be used to approve similar drugs
– Protect the right of public health programs like Medicare to negotiate prescription prices
– Protect the rights of countries, agreed to in the Doha side agreement, to produce or import life saving medicines even if under patent protection, to lower the costs of essential medicines and encourage local and regional production
– Reduce the market exclusivity period for newer medicines in order to reduce delays in producing generic drugs, or allow this to be determined in international health forums
– Create a globally funded network to promote essential medical research and development that addresses public health needs, including addressing international pandemics related to increased global trade, and keep publicly funded research in the public domain
Promote equitable access to healthcare
– Do not use trade policy to promote privatization of public services, including health services, nor include provisions that prevent the return of that service to public control
– Provide a risk assessment, conducted by health professionals, on the possible impacts of any new trade agreement on public health prior to finalizing a trade agreement
Workers, Economic Development, and Broadly Shared Prosperity
Workers, Economic Development, and Broadly Shared Prosperity
“Goods produced under conditions which do not meet a rudimentary standard of decency should be regarded as contraband and not allowed to pollute the channels of international commerce.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt, U.S. President 1933-1945
A trade policy that works for everyone – here in Washington State, in the U.S., and around the world— must improve economic and social stability for all.
All work has dignity, and workers deserve a share of the wealth they create. In a globalized economy, trade policies must set minimum work standards and protections on a global level, and also encourage a race to the top for worker safety and well being. This includes building transparency and accountability along entire supply chains, and protecting and supporting the right of workers to organize and build power so that they earn a fair wage, are safe, healthy, and economically secure. This also means maintaining a strong public sector and safety net, and regulating financial speculation and other practices that destabilize the economy.
Companies must also be accountable to, and invest in, the communities where they operate; this means paying their taxes and living wages, contributing to local infrastructure, using ethical suppliers, and, if production shifts or changes, working with local communities to support a transition. Any equitable trade policy must also acknowledge the longstanding institutional racism, sexism, colonialism, and unfair treatment of immigrants that has impacted the opportunities available to different communities, and should support efforts to remediate and eliminate those historic and ongoing wrongs.
Trade Policies Now: Pitting workers against each other in the race to the bottom
NAFTA established a new corporate-centric framework for globalization, allowing companies to pit workers against each other by moving production to low-wage regions and shipping the products back to sell in high-wage regions. Entire industries moved – home appliances, textiles, clothing, steel, electronics, call centers, automobile production– consolidating on unprecedented levels.
These global giants accumulated political power, often forcing out smaller businesses which were trying to pay their workforce a living wage. As good paying work disappeared and wages stagnated, entire communities were devastated and millions of workers forced to migrate in search of economic opportunity.
When challenged by workers or communities to improve conditions and invest locally, global companies claimed this would make them less competitive in the global economy and threatened to move. Often, governments cut social services to cover concessions to large businesses. Attempts to mandate local job creation, build transparency in supply chains, or regulate financial flows, have all been challenged as barriers to trade.
Good trade policy puts workers and their communities first:
Set minimum working standards on a global level
- Require that, before getting preferred market access, countries ratify and implement the International Labor Organization’s eight core labor conventions on the right to organize and collectively bargain, eliminating forced labor, child labor, fair pay, and discrimination
- Prohibit trade in products produced by child labor, forced labor, and slave labor
Empower working people to raise standards
- Protect rights of workers to organize, form independent unions, and bargain collectively, including cross-border bargaining when employers operate in multiple countries
- Create an independent arbitration body that is accessible to workers and can sanction countries and companies that violate labor and environmental standards
Hold corporations accountable
- Ensure that global companies pay their fair share of taxes by adding rules to combat international tax avoidance and by harmonizing money laundering laws
- Support supply chain accountability and transparency, including initiatives like Country of Origin Labeling
- Include anti-trust measures to respond to unfair market practices and global monopolies
Promote economic stability on the individual, community, national, and global levels
- Require regions to set a living minimum wage
- Require investors to financially support a transition fund for communities when relocating to lower condition countries
- Set baseline regulations for the financial sector and allow countries to set additional regulations to keep financial data secure and to limit international speculation
- Establish meaningful controls to address currency misalignment
- Enforce controls to limit the market distortions from state-owned enterprises
Protect and encourage the ability of local governments to invest in the local economy
- Allow local governments to set buy-local and hire-local preferences for public projects and programs
- Strengthen Rules of Origin to encourage manufacturers to source most of their parts locally or in countries that are bound by the trade agreement
- Allow governments to require companies operating in their area to invest locally, including mandating local ownership, local sourcing, and technology transfers
- Allow public policies, including public investments and tariffs, to protect nascent, strategic, and culturally important industries
WFTC Positions and Endorsements
• Co-sponsor of CAGJ “Strengthening Local Economies Everywhere”
The WFTC is a proud ongoing sponsor of the “Strengthening Local Economies, Everywhere” Dinner and Fair organized by the Community Alliance for Global Justice. This annual event has been held since 2007 in Seattle. The goal of this event is to educate and inspire the public to take action to build alternatives to corporate-led globalization. The event will help strengthen alliances between the burgeoning ‘buy local’ and sustainability movements, and the fair trade and global justice movements in the Northwest. Together we can work to ensure that people everywhere have healthy local economies, in which workers, immigrants and small farmers are treated fairly. (Ongoing)
• Employee Free Choice Act
The Washington Fair Trade Coalition has endorsed the Employee Free Choice Act, a bill that aims to ensure the rights of workers to join a union if they choose. The right for workers to organize is clearly linked to our mission to create a fair global trading system in which core workers’ rights, community values, and our environment are safeguarded. (Spring 2010)
• 3-country Declaration of Solidarity with Mexican Campesinos
The Washington Fair Trade Coalition joins hundreds of other civil society groups from Mexico, Canada, and the US in a statement of solidarity with Mexican farmers’ and indigenous organizations who are working to halt the agricultural trade liberalization that is destroying the Mexican countryside, rural communities, indigenous peoples and farmers, driving them into economic exile. We support their proposals to rebuild Mexican agriculture, food sovereignty and rural development. …full declaration(February 2008)
• HR 2634 – Jubilee Act of 2007
The Washington Fair Trade Coalition joins social justice and other groups to endorse HR 2634, the Jubilee Act for Responsible Lending and Expanded Debt Cancellation of 2007. This legislation cancels impoverished country debt; removes harmful economic conditions from the cancellation process; mandates transparency and accountability; and establishes a framework for more responsible and transparent lending practices in the future. This is timely legislation. Congress is seeking to find a new direction for international trade policy, and we contend that debt cancellation should be one component of a new, pro-active agenda on trade. This would help level the economic playing field and encourage healthy, fair economic relations between countries. (Fall 2007)
• International Day of Action Against Big Box Retailers
The Washington Fair Trade Coalition endorses International Day of Action on November 17, 2007 against the 5 largest supermarket chains in the world, including Wal-Mart. This day of action will call attention to the issues with Big Box Retailers, including worker rights violations, buyer power abuses, unsustainable distribution practices, destruction of local independent businesses and small-scale farming, and exploitation of agricultural and other labor. (Fall 2007)
• Supporting SLAP’s call for a DSP Program at UW
The Washington Fair Trade Coalition applauds the success of UW SLAP – Student Labor Action Project – as they work to establish a Designated Supplier Program at UW. This policy change will insure UW-branded materials come from suppliers that have been designated as fair employers. (Spring 2007)
• Building Sustainable Futures for Farmers Globally
The Washington Fair Trade Coalition believes that trade policy should support sustainable agricultural practices, and must not restrict governments’ ability to safeguard their food supply, rural development programs, and small farmers. As a consequence, we endorse the “Building Sustainable Futures for Farmers Globally” Campaign. (Fall 2006)