|
Nov 8, 2007 WFTC Press Release:
Washington Democrats Disappoint
on US-Peru Trade Agreement
Washington State’s Democratic contingent in the U.S. House unanimously
supported another in a long string of flawed NAFTA-style trade deals this
morning, as the House passed the US-Peru Free Trade Agreement (FTA) by a
285-132 vote. While the agreement was highly contentious, every Democrat
from the state of Washington voted in favor of it. With political party
pressures appearing to trump the need to create fair and effective trade
policy, this result is a huge disappointment to many Washington residents.
Washington’s Democrats' support for the US-Peru FTA came in the face of
strong opposition to the agreement from labor, environmental and social
justice communities throughout the state. These organizations reacted
quickly to this morning’s news that their Congressional Representatives had
retreated from their previous stand for fair trade, as exemplified by the
2005 CAFTA vote.
"We are
extremely disappointed in the Democratic Representatives in Washington
State," says Stephanie Celt, State Coordinator of the Washington Fair Trade
Coalition, which represents 29 member organizations that did not support the
agreement. "Our Democratic Representatives have shown us that they are not
concerned about creating a fair trade agenda for this country. Instead, they
rushed into a flawed agreement that many of their constituents opposed,
because of pressure from Democratic leadership and multinational
corporations, citing the vague promises that all problems in US trade policy
have been fixed. They haven't."
"They
think a 'yes' vote on this agreement with give them added leverage after the
2008 elections. Instead, it will cost them - it has greatly reduced many
people's faith that these leaders will represent the best interests of
Washington residents, and the best interests of the countries we trade
with."
Surprisingly, the only Washington Representatives to vote against the FTA
were Republicans. Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Doc Hastings, two of the
state's three Republican Representatives, both opposed the FTA. These
Representatives' votes were influenced by the growing unrest of farmers and
ranchers in their rural districts regarding "free trade" deals.
(Indeed, a recent WSJ/NBC poll found that 60% of registered Republicans
believe "free trade" is bad for the country.)
Environmental groups are
critical of Washington Democrats as well. "It is obvious that we cannot
build a sustainable and prosperous trading system if we ignore critical
global issues such as global warming and toxic chemicals. But the Peru FTA
does just that," says Marina Skumanich, president of Seattle Audubon. "It is
deeply disappointing that our environmental champions from Washington State
such as Jay Inslee and Jim McDermott - rather than standing firm for the
environment - chose instead to rubber stamp yet another NAFTA expansion
deal."
Organized labor was also unconvinced by this FTA, as no major union endorsed
the deal. The inclusion of revamped language regarding the protection of
labor rights was not enough to gain the support of unions in either the US
or Peru.
The
experience of other developing countries entering into trade deals with the
U.S. is also cause for alarm. “For our Representatives to tout proposals
aimed at curbing global poverty and then continue to support a
poverty-inducing trade agenda is hypocritical at best,” said Cameron
Herrington, Director of Seattle CISPES – Committee in Solidarity with the
People of El Salvador. "The experience of Mexico as part of the North
American Free Trade Agreement, and now the Central American countries under
CAFTA, clearly demonstrates that FTAs between the U.S. and poor countries
lead to increased poverty, unemployment and forced migration.”
The
Senate is expected to vote on the US-Peru FTA soon. It is yet to be seen
whether Washington State Senators will also support this flawed and
potentially harmful trade agreement. |